A strong man takes another’s wife but fails to provide for her and her children. The original husband, though poor, eventually hunts successfully, bringing back meat for his starving children. The stronger man, unable to match this feat, returns the wife, acknowledging his inadequacy. This story highlights themes of true capability and responsibility.
Source:
The Beaver Indians
by Pliny Earle Goddard
The American Museum of Natural History – Anthropological Papers
Volume X, Part 4
New York, 1912
► Themes of the story
Love and Betrayal: The narrative centers on a man who takes another’s wife, leading to complex interpersonal dynamics and feelings of betrayal.
Family Dynamics: The story highlights the struggles of a father striving to provide for his children amidst challenging circumstances.
Cunning and Deception: One character deceives others by pretending to have hunted successfully, using blood from his nose and arranged pine brush to simulate a kill.
► From the same Region or People
Learn more about the Dane-zaa people
Once there was a man who, although poor was strong. There was a married man, camped by himself who was not so strong. Having lost his wife to the stronger man, he said to himself, “Why is it he does not kill anything? They will kill my children.” He continued living with them in the same camp. The man who had taken the wife away hunted a good deal but did not kill anything. Although the children were about to die of starvation he paid no attention to them. The other man who had always been poor hunted but did not kill anything. Finally, the grandmother of the children said to her son-in-law, “It seems as if your children will starve. Why do you not do something about it?” “Well, get my arrows out,” he replied to his mother-in-law.
► Continue reading…
He hunted along one side of the road until he came to a band of caribou. He killed them all and carried a large quantity of the meat back with him for the children. The poor man who shared the camp with him had said he would move the camp to a considerable distance. The father went back to the road which he followed. He had already passed the new camp. They had not gone further than he had in hunting. Suddenly, he saw the tent standing in front of him. He put the load down outside and went in without it. “Mother-in-law, you will find some partridge dung over there from which you can make some soup for the children,” he said. “I brought it for that purpose; bring it inside.” His partner spoke up, “I saw it lying there and left it. Do not get it, for my children will choke on it.” The old woman brought the load in, and when the other man saw it was meat he was much pleased. They went for the remainder of the meat.
The other man went away hunting the next morning and came home in the evening. His leggings were covered with frozen blood. He did not bring back meat but said they would go for it in the morning. When they came where he claimed to have killed the animals it was apparent the caribou had run away from him. The blood on his leggings was from his nose. He had broken pine brush and covered it with snow thinking it would be mistaken for caribou carcasses. “What is the matter; it is nothing but pine brush. He said it was caribou meat,” the father of the children said when he saw it.
They went back and the man who had taken the wife away gave her back, for he concluded he was not capable enough around the camp to have the responsibility of a wife. They say he was that kind of a man.
This happened when they were wearing breechcloths of skin.
Running and expanding this site requires resources: from maintaining our digital platform to sourcing and curating new content. With your help, we can grow our collection, improve accessibility, and bring these incredible narratives to an even wider audience. Your sponsorship enables us to keep the world’s stories alive and thriving. ♦ Visit our Support page

You must be logged in to post a comment.